Lots, and much of it with animals
The NY Times has a great Family Movie Guide for parents trying to calculate what movies are appropriate for their children. MPAA movie ratings are vague and often worthless to a discerning parent. This Family Movie Guide has over 100 profiles (and corresponding reviews) of movies that chilren may be interested in seeing (i.e. you won’t find “Requiem for a Dream”). Here’s a good example of the level of detail, found in this entry for Daredevil:
PARENTAL NOTES
VIOLENCE: Much kung-fu with the usual damage inflicted, but the action is so continual and exaggerated it has no root in reality.
SEX: Murdock and Elektra go to bed together, but we don’t go with them.
PROFANITY: A fair amount of cussing and some mild raunchiness.
FOR WHICH CHILDREN?
UNDER AGE 8: The death of Murdock’s father will be disturbing, as will other violence, especially one killing that takes place as if in a comic book.
AGES 8-10: Parents’ decision, but most children won’t be bothered. That doesn’t make it appropriate.
AGES 11-13: Daredevil, his opponent Bullseye (Mr. Farrell) and all the action are appealing, and there’s no hugely compelling reason to bar the door.
So naturally, I searched the Guide for the most explicitly violent, sex-drenching, sailor-swearing film to see what they had to say. No dice. But you should check out these noteworthy entries:
- American Pie (”Since this is a film about sex, there is a representative sampling, including standard intercourse, masturbation and oral sex.”)
- Austin Powers (”…And Austin prances nude, though not frontally so. It’s silly stuff, but where children are concerned it adds up to considerable sexual content.”)
- South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut (”Obviously the film has immense appeal for viewers under 17. Given theater owners’ announced intentions to check ages at R-rated films, the situation should be interesting.”)
- Freddy Got Fingered, the Tom Green vehicle, (”SEX: Lots, and much of it involving animals.”)