Contracts is by far my favorite class entirely because of our puckish professor’s wit and oratory. A sample:
Professor: What does UCC §2-204 say?
Student: Off the top of my head?
Professor: Off the invisible scriptures of your heart.
Usually I sit in class, imagining witty rejoinders and hoping for a moment of performance fantasy, where I can illuminate the way to wit, and shine brightly for a million ships lost in a dull darkness, and be dualing mages conjuring up clever beast after clever beast, tit given for mindful tat, the balance of class cudgelled into a numb awe by humor transcendent of all our stations.
Today, I got that moment, and was called on for, arguably, the best case of the year: Leonard v Pepsico (someone sues Pepsi to redeem 7,000,000 Pepsi Points for a Harrier Jet featured in a commercial). Sufficiency says: I ate it. Hard.
I started with the facts, cold and straight. He asked me to goose it up a bit. Peel away the onion with illustrious oratory. Advocate. Make fact into slanted fiction, he said. I paused. faltered. stuttered. mumbled. I spiraled down into low, inaudible tones, embarassed for myself and for the entire bloodline of selfish crabs.
The professor moved on. Onto greater and better-spoken pastures. Class ends. I slunk off, hood drawn.
In hindsight, phooey! I am a poor player, a fraudulent minstrel. I wanted to use the word “gamboll”, not “walk”. “Wisps of torrid paper foreshadowed its entrance”, not “da plane came down in front of da school”. Fuck, I couldn’t tell a story if I were a bewedded Persian virgin slated for death in the morn.
And now I am sitting here during my lunch hour, trying to manufacture a parity of wit. Moping like a dope. Trying to show the world, gee golly, gosh darn it, that I’m not an oaf.
# 2006 Oct 25
{law school}